Deprecated: mysql_connect(): The mysql extension is deprecated and will be removed in the future: use mysqli or PDO instead in /home/sites/herpetofauna.org.uk/public_html/forum_archive/forum_posts.php on line 73

RAUK - Archived Forum - Natrix maura or tesselata???

This contains the Forum posts up until the end of March, 2011. Posts may be viewed but cannot be edited or replied to - nor can new posts be made. More recent posts can be seen on the new Forum at http://www.herpetofauna.co.uk/forum/

Forum Home

Natrix maura or tesselata???:

Author Message
-LAF
Senior Member
Joined: 03 Apr 2003
No. of posts: 317


View other posts by -LAF
Posted: 26 Apr 2005
Hi guys, I was wondering if anyone out there knew of a sure fire way of telling Natrix maura from Natrix tesselata from a side-on head photograph. I'm affraid I can't post the picture as it isn't mine but it is of extreme interest to me as it one of these snakes and (I beleive the latter but want to be sure) and was taken on a part of the old Thorne-Moor complex, the same complex that included Holme-upon-Spalding moor, which was known to have had N. tesselata introduced there in the 1970s. I'm making efforts to contact the photographer to get a date and confirmation but I don't beleive the image to be fake as he miss-identified it. Any good advice (which upper labials enter the eye etc) would be mucho appreciated. Lee-LAF38468.7568287037
Lee Fairclough
Caleb
Forum Coordinator
Joined: 17 Feb 2003
No. of posts: 448


View other posts by Caleb
Posted: 27 Apr 2005
I was told years ago that the number of preoculars and postoculars is a reasonable way to distinguish the 3 European species.

Boulenger's 'Snakes of Europe', (available for free at
http://www.herper.com/ebooks/titles/Europesnakes.html, pdf, approx 2MB) says:

N.n. 1 pre, 3 post
N.t. 2 pre, 3 post
N.m. 1 or 2 pre, 2 post.
-LAF
Senior Member
Joined: 03 Apr 2003
No. of posts: 317


View other posts by -LAF
Posted: 27 Apr 2005
Cheers Caleb. I totally forgot about using that book, it's excellent for morphology. That should do the trick nicely! Many thanks.

Regards, Lee.
Lee Fairclough
-LAF
Senior Member
Joined: 03 Apr 2003
No. of posts: 317


View other posts by -LAF
Posted: 27 Apr 2005
Right. The snake in question in Natrix maura. I now have an strong suspicion that this is not the first picture of such a snake from this site tha I have encountered. The other image was an 'adder' photographed on this site, feigning death... odd adder behaviour, very natrix. Need to get a second look now.

Thanks for the help.

Lee.
Lee Fairclough
Vicar
Senior Member
Joined: 02 Sep 2004
No. of posts: 1181


View other posts by Vicar
Posted: 30 Apr 2005

Just added to assist confirmation:

{A Field Guide to the Reptiles and Amphibians of Britain and Europe, Arnold & Burton, 0 00 219318 3 - Excellent book imo !}

Vicar38472.2265856481
Steve Langham - Chairman    
Surrey Amphibian & Reptile Group (SARG).
-LAF
Senior Member
Joined: 03 Apr 2003
No. of posts: 317


View other posts by -LAF
Posted: 30 Apr 2005
Thanks for that Steve. Both my copies of this book are with other people so wasn't able to check. I've enclosed a link to one of the two photo's below:

Photo

Pretty sure it's N. maura. Will come back to the site details when I've spoken to the photographer. Hopefully second photo from the site to follow soon.

Regards, Lee.
Lee Fairclough
Jeroen
Senior Member
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
No. of posts: 121


View other posts by Jeroen
Posted: 30 Apr 2005

Hi Lee, for what it's worth - I agree with the ID. The dice snakes I have seen never had such obvious markings on the flanks and the zigzag is (still) visible quite well.


Jeroen Speybroeck
http://www.hylawerkgroep.be/jeroen/
Wolfgang Wuster
Senior Member
Joined: 23 Apr 2003
No. of posts: 326


View other posts by Wolfgang Wuster
Posted: 30 Apr 2005
Yep, that is definitely N. maura. As far as I can make out, it has two postocs, and I would say that supralabs 3 and 4 enter the eye. Also, apart from the pattern characters mentioned by Jeroen, N. tesellata normally has a more or less uniform top of the head, whereas N. maura has a distinct head pattern, which is visible on that photo.

Cheers,

Wolfgang
Wolfgang Wüster
School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor
http://sbsweb.bangor.ac.uk/~bss166/
Dan Kane
Senior Member
Joined: 30 Dec 2005
No. of posts: 201


View other posts by Dan Kane
Posted: 30 Dec 2005
Yes, I agree with Wolfgang. Its a Natrix maura because of the dark spots on the flanks and because of the viper-like zigzag along the back, typical of N. maura. Dice Snakes normally have a uniform light brown head, whilst Viperine Snakes often have darker markings on the head.
Dan

www.randacumbria.moonfruit.com

- Natrix maura or tesselata???

Content here